Vasquez

(PC) Rockemore v. Vasquez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20251:21-cv-01339California846 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUNTEZ K. ROCKEMORE, No. 1:21-cv-01339 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

TO STIPULATE AS PREMATURELY FILED

v. (ECF No. 65) A. VASQUEZ, et al.,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

Defendants. FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AS NOT

RELEVANT TO THIS CASE

16 (ECF No. 68)

18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 19 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 20 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 Plaintiff has filed a request to stipulate (ECF No. 65) and a request for judicial notice 22 (ECF No. 68). For the reasons stated below, both motions will be denied.

I. PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO STIPULATE TO AUTHENTICITY

24 In Plaintiff’s request to stipulate, Plaintiff requests that Defendants stipulate to the 25 authenticity of the official and medical records Plaintiff which Plaintiff submitted as Exhibits A 26 and B in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.