Cano

(PC) KasenzangaKhona v. Cano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20251:23-cv-01764California5,715 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAKAZULU SIGIDI Case No.: 1:23-cv-001764-JLT-SKO

KASENZANGAKHONA,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO Plaintiff, DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM FOLLOWING v. SCREENING

L. CANO, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE

15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Shakazulu Sigidi KasenzangaKhona is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. BACKGROUND The Court issued its First Screening Order on March 12, 2024, (doc. 12), and found that Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted against any named defendant. (Id. at 4-13.) Plaintiff was granted leave to file a first amended complaint, curing the deficiencies identified in the screening order, within 21 days. (Id. at 13-14.) Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on March 18, 2024. (Doc. 15.) On March 27, 2024, Plaintiff filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.