Granada

Granada v. TD Bank USA, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20251:25-cv-00200California319 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOIDA GRANADA, Case No. 1:25-cv-00200-KES-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE

COURT TO TERMINATE TRANSUNION,

v. LLC AS A DEFENDANT IN THIS ACTION

TD BANK USA, N.A., et al., (ECF No. 15) Defendants.

16 On April 2, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal of Defendant TransUnion, LLC with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 15.) “[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), ‘a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.’ ” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) (quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997)). The Ninth Circuit has held that Rule 41(a) allows a plaintiff to dismiss without a court order any defendant who has yet to serve an answer or motion for summary judgment. Pedrina v. Chun, 987 F.2d 608, 609…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.