Adams

(PC) Alcaraz v. Adams

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20252:24-cv-00776California1,362 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TEODORO SEVERIANO ALCARAZ., No. 2:24-cv-0776 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADAMS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are plaintiff’s motion for extension of time, request for refund, and request to withdraw the petition. ECF Nos. 15, 16. I. Background On March 13, 2024, plaintiff filed the complaint in this case. ECF No. 1. The court directed plaintiff to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the required filing fee plus the administrative fees. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff was advised that even if the court granted him leave to proceed with his case in forma pauperis, he would still be required to pay the full $350 filing fee. Id. at 1 n.1. On April 17, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 4. On January 2, 2025, the court granted plaintiff’s request to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.