(PS)Zito

(PS)Zito v. Holland

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20252:24-cv-02205California1,518 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS J. ZITO, Case No. 2:24-cv-02205-DAD-CSK PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO

v. PROSECUTE KEITH HOLLAND, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Thomas J. Zito, proceeding without the aid of counsel, filed this action on August 15, 2024 against Defendant Keith Holland.1 (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff paid the filing fee and was provided a summons and initial scheduling order. (See ECF Nos. 1, 2, 3.) The initial scheduling order stated:

21 Plaintiff shall complete service of process on all Defendants named in the complaint within 90 days from the date of this order. Plaintiff shall provide each Defendant with a copy of (i) the summons; (ii) the complaint; (iii) this order; and (iv) the Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment information. 24 Within 10 days after service of process on a given Defendant, Plaintiff(s) 25 shall file with the Clerk a certificate stating that the Defendant was served…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.