(PS) Warfield v. California Highway Patrol

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20252:24-cv-02886California422 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRODERICK WARFIELD, No. 2:24-cv-2886-DJC-CSK (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF Nos. 13, 31.) CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL GOLDEN GATE DIVISION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 2, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 13), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations on December 9, 2024 (ECF No. 16), December 13, 2024 (ECF No. 18), which have been considered by the court. This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.