Aurora Regino v. Kelly Staley
Opinion
Opinion
Christen, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AURORA REGINO, No. 23-16031
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00032- v. JAM-DMC
KELLY STALEY, Superintendent,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellee,
and
CAITLIN DALBY; REBECCA
KONKIN; TOM LANDO; EILEEN
ROBINSON; MATT TENNIS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 9, 2024 Pasadena, California
Filed April 4, 2025 Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Morgan Christen, and Mark J. Bennett, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Christen
SUMMARY *
Due Process
The panel vacated the district court’s dismissal of a complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Aurora Regino, who challenged a Chico Unified School District policy under which the District began using Regino’s child’s new preferred name and pronoun without informing her. Regino, raising facial and as-applied challenges, alleged that enforcement of the District’s policy deprived her of her rights to both substantive and procedural due process. The district court…