Bondi

Villegas Avendano v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202523-4055California622 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OSCAR EDUARDO VILLEGAS No. 23-4055 AVENDANO; DIANA MARCELA Agency Nos.

ARANDA BARRERA; GABRIELA A240-609-441

VILLEGAS ARANDA, A240-084-545

A240-084-546

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 2, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: GILMAN***, M. SMITH, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Oscar Eduardo Villegas Avendano, Diana Marcela Aranda

Barrera, and their minor daughter, (collectively “Petitioners”) are natives and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Ronald Lee Gilman, United States Circuit Judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.