Medina-Gomez
Medina-Gomez v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202523-4116California1,009 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NAUN GABRIEL MEDINA- No. 23-4116 GOMEZ; JOSUE GABRIEL MEDINA- Agency Nos.
URBINA, A220-490-455
A220-490-456
Petitioners,
v. MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 1, 2025** Portland, Oregon
Before: BYBEE, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Petitioners Naun Gabriel Medina-Gomez and Josue Gabriel Medina-Urbina,
natives and citizens of Honduras, seek review of a decision by the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of
their applications for asylum and withholding of…