trx.com

Jfxd Trx Acq LLC v. trx.com

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202524-3391California690 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

APR 4 2025

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

JFXD TRX ACQ LLC, a Florida limited No. 24-1661 liability company, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-02330-ROS Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

TRX.COM, a domain name; LOO TZE MING, an individual from Malaysia,

Defendants - Appellees.

JFXD TRX ACQ LLC, No. 24-3391

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-02330-ROS

v.

TRX.COM; LOO TZE MING,

Defendants - Appellees.

*

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 2, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: HAWKINS, W. FLETCHER, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

In these two appeals, Appellant, JFXD TRX ACQ LLC (“JFXD”),

challenges both the dismissal of its complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.