Bondi

De Santiago-Mendoza v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202524-1293California1,129 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTIN DE SANTIAGO-MENDOZA, No. 24-1293

Petitioner, Agency No. A 200-947-745

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 28, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: BERZON and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and LEFKOW,*** District

Judge.

Martin De Santiago-Mendoza, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel has unanimously concluded this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Joan H. Lefkow, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation. immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his claims for withholding of removal and

protection under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.