WCAB
Co. of Sacramento v. WCAB
Opinion
Opinion
DISCUSSION so that the paragraph begins, “The County contends”. This modification does not change the judgment.
THE COURT:
RAYE , P. J.
NICHOLSON , J.
HOCH , J.
The question presented here is whether the causes of Brooks‟s psychiatric injury were personnel actions. The parties do not dispute whether those actions were lawful, nondiscriminatory, and taken in good faith. With that understanding, we refer to the defense under section 3208.3, subdivision (h) as the “personnel action defense” because it is unnecessary to be more specific.
3 Filed 4/22/13 (unmodified version)
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento) ----
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, C067739
Petitioner, WCAB Case No.
ADJ1898181
v. (SAC 0367383)
WORKERS‟ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD
and MICHAEL BROOKS,
Respondents.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING; petition for writ of review from a decision of the Workers‟ Compensation Appeals Board. Annulled and remanded.