Guzman

Guzman v. Hammond CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 4, 2025A171589California2,241 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petrou, J.

Filed 4/4/25 Guzman v. Hammond CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ANEL GUZMAN,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A171589

v. TYRON HAMMOND, (Lake County Super. Ct. No. FL216760) Defendant and Appellant.

Tyron Hammond appeals from an order renewing Anel Guzman’s domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) against him and denying his request to modify the custody and visitation order regarding their children. Hammond avers the court abused its discretion in extending the DVRO, failed to adequately explain its reasoning as to the custody and visitation order, and violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In August 2021, the court granted Guzman a three-year DVRO against Hammond…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.