Coker
Coker v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
Opinion
Opinion
Huffman, J.
Filed 7/23/
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CAROL COKER, D061720
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2011-00087958-
CU-MC-CTL)
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Luis R.
Vargas, Judge. Reversed and remanded with directions.
Stilwell & Associates and Andrew R. Stilwell for Plaintiff and Appellant.
AlvaradoSmith, John M. Sorich, S. Christopher Yoo and Jenny L. Merris for
Defendants and Respondents.
Housing and Economic Rights Advocates, Elizabeth S. Letcher; National Housing
Law Project and Kent Qian as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. In this appeal we are asked to determine a question of first impression. Do the
anti-deficiency protections in Code of Civil Procedure1 section 580b apply to a borrower
after she, with the approval of her lender, sells her residence to a third party for a price
that is less than the outstanding balance owed the lender on the borrower's mortgage loan,
which…