Do
Do v. The Regents of the University of California
Opinion
Opinion
Huffman, J.
Filed 5/13/13 Certified for publication 6/11/13 (order attached)
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
JAMES DO, D061056
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2011-00083720-
CU-WM-CTL)
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA,
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Ronald L.
Styn, Judge. Affirmed.
Law Office of Jose A. Gonzales and Jose A. Gonzales for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Paul, Plevin, Sullivan & Connaughton, Sandra L. McDonough and Corrie J.
Klekowski for Defendant and Respondent.
Plaintiff and appellant James Do appeals the judgment denying his petition for a
writ of administrative mandamus against defendant and respondent Regents of the University of California (University). (Code Civ. Proc.,1 § 1094.5.) Do's employment at
a University medical facility was terminated in August 2009, based on administrative
findings his statements and acts violated an employment policy against workplace
violence or threats.