Do

Do v. The Regents of the University of California

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 11, 2013D061056California6,905 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

Filed 5/13/13 Certified for publication 6/11/13 (order attached)

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES DO, D061056

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2011-00083720-

CU-WM-CTL)

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

CALIFORNIA,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Ronald L.

Styn, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Office of Jose A. Gonzales and Jose A. Gonzales for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Paul, Plevin, Sullivan & Connaughton, Sandra L. McDonough and Corrie J.

Klekowski for Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiff and appellant James Do appeals the judgment denying his petition for a

writ of administrative mandamus against defendant and respondent Regents of the University of California (University). (Code Civ. Proc.,1 § 1094.5.) Do's employment at

a University medical facility was terminated in August 2009, based on administrative

findings his statements and acts violated an employment policy against workplace

violence or threats.

On appeal, Do contends the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.