In re Tobacco Cases I
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 4/26/13; mod. filed 5/8/13; pub. order 5/20/13 (see end of opn. for mod. & pub. order)
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In re TOBACCO CASES I D061077, D061676
(Super. Ct. No. JCCP 4041)
CONSOLIDATED APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of San Diego
County, Ronald S. Prager, Judge. Affirmed.
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (Reynolds) challenges trial court orders issued
after remand in the last appeal in this matter, which award the People of the State of
California $2,943,920.63 in contractual attorney fees as the prevailing parties in an action
to enforce a consent decree and final judgment (Consent Decree) entered on a master
settlement agreement (MSA). Reynolds contends the court erred in its prevailing party
determination because the People did not achieve "greater relief" on the contract as
required by Civil Code section 1717 (section 1717), subdivision (b)(1)). Alternatively,
Reynolds contends the court erred by applying market rates for San Francisco Bay Area
attorneys when determining the lodestar amount of fees, instead of local San Diego market rates, and by not…