Tyler

Tyler v. Gomez

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20253:24-cv-02346California603 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5 CLAUDIE TYLER, Case No.: 24-cv-2346-BEN (BLM) CDCR #K19763

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

B. GOMEZ, et al., Defendants. 12 13 Claudie Tyler (“Plaintiff” or “Tyler”), currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan State Prison (“RJD”) located in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not prepaid the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead, he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $402. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.