Guillen

The People v. Guillen

Good Law
160 Cal. Rptr. 3d 589·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 627·218 Cal. App. 4th 975·2013 WL 4017906
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 8, 2013E055022California9,928 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

This is a People’s appeal from an order of the trial court dismissing the restitution fines originally imposed on defendant and respondent Armando Guillen. Defendant was admitted to probation through a drug court program. Eventually, defendant successfully completed his court-ordered drug treatment program, and the court terminated probation early. The court dismissed all the charges and suspended or dismissed all the imposed fines, including any restitution fines that had not been fully paid. The People now appeal, contending that the trial court erred in suspending, dismissing or otherwise terminating the unpaid restitution fines. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 2010, defendant was charged by a complaint with three offenses: felony possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)), felony sale or transportation of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379, subd. (a)), and misdemeanor driving while his license was suspended for driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol (Veh. Code, § 14601.2, subd. (a)). Soon after being charged, defendant agreed to change his plea, and to plead guilty, in exchange for probation and admission to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.