Robert W. Carlson v. Brian Birkholz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CARLSON, Case No. 2:24-cv-08013-FLA (E)

Petitioner, SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER v. ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF

BRIAN BIRKHOLZ, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE AND GRANTING

Respondent. PETITIONER’S MOTION TO FILE LATE OBJECTIONS [DKTS. 17, 21, 24]

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Further, the court has considered Petitioner’s objections, Dkt. 21, and engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made.1 In this habeas action, Petitioner, a federal prisoner, challenges a disciplinary sanction for unlawful possession of a cell phone. Dkt. 1 at 3. The Report recommends the grant of Respondent’s motion to dismiss and the denial and 9 …