Mongia

Mongia v. City of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20251:23-cv-01234California1,992 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ISAAC MONGIA, Case No. 1:23-cv-01234-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

v. DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE BASED

ON (1) THE YOUNGER ABSTENTION

CITY OF FRESNO, et al. DOCTRINE AND (2) PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER AND

Defendants. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.

(ECF No. 19).

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY

16 (30) DAYS.

Plaintiff Isaac Mongia proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 3, 18). On February 12, 2025, the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to show cause within thirty-days as to why this action should not be dismissed due to Plaintiff’s state criminal proceedings under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 43–54 (1971), or Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). (See ECF No. 19). The Court warned Plaintiff that “[f]ailure to respond to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.