Taylor

(HC) Plaza-Uzeta v. Taylor

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20251:23-cv-01773California515 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUBEN PLAZA-UZETA, Case No. 1:23-cv-01773-HBK (HC) Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING CLARIFICATION TO

LIMITED EXTENT1

v. (Doc. No. 24) TAYLOR, FCI Mendota Warden, Respondent. 16 Before the Court is Petitioner’s “motion for clarification of judgment.” (Doc. No. 24, “Motion”). Petitioner Ruben Plaza-Uzeta is a federal prisoner who initiated this action by filing a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. No. 1, “Petition”). On October 15, 2024, the undersigned granted Respondent’s motion to dismiss the Petition, the Petition was dismissed, and judgment was entered the same day. (Doc. Nos. 19-20). On October 29, 2024, Petitioner filed a Notice of Appeal, and the Appeal was processed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on the same day. (Doc. Nos. 21-22). On January 13, 2025, Petitioner filed the instant Motion requesting clarification as to whether a certificate of appealability “would be required…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.