Sneed
Sneed v. The Procter & Gamble Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STEPHEN SNEED, et al., Case No. 23-cv-05443-JST
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Re: ECF No. 52 Defendant.
12 Before the Court is Defendant Procter & Gamble Company’s (“P&G”) motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. ECF No. 52. The Court will deny the motion. I. BACKGROUND Because the facts are well-known to the parties and the Court has summarized the background of this action in detail in its prior order, ECF No. 45, the Court will not elaborate them in their entirety here. In sum, P&G sells several “Nighttime Sleep Aid” products (hereinafter, “Product(s)”) containing diphenhydramine hydrochloride (“diphenhydramine”) under the ZzzQuil brand. ECF No. 47 ¶ 2, 4, 12 (“SAC”). Plaintiffs Stephen Sneed and Nickolas Cannon bring this putative class action against P&G for allegedly “falsely and misleadingly advertis[ing], label[ing], and packag[ing]…