Williams v. Chino Valley Ind. Fire Dist.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 23, 2013E055755California4,296 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/23/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

LORING WINN WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E055755

v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVRS801732)

CHINO VALLEY INDEPENDENT FIRE OPINION

DISTRICT,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Janet M. Frangie,

Judge. Affirmed.

Loring Winn Williams, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, Peter J. Brown and Judith S. Islas for Defendant and

Respondent.

Plaintiff and Appellant Loring Winn Williams lost a FEHA (California Fair

Employment and Housing Act, Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) case in which he sued

defendant and respondent Chino Valley Independent Fire District (the District) for

employment discrimination (case No. E052123). The trial court then granted Williams’s

1 motions to tax costs in part and entered an order granting the District costs of $5,368.88.

Williams appeals from the order, contending that no costs should have been allowed.

The order is appealable under Code of Civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.