Williams v. Chino Valley Ind. Fire Dist.
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 23, 2013E055755California4,296 words
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 7/23/
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
LORING WINN WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff and Appellant, E055755
v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVRS801732)
CHINO VALLEY INDEPENDENT FIRE OPINION
DISTRICT,
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Janet M. Frangie,
Judge. Affirmed.
Loring Winn Williams, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, Peter J. Brown and Judith S. Islas for Defendant and
Respondent.
Plaintiff and Appellant Loring Winn Williams lost a FEHA (California Fair
Employment and Housing Act, Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) case in which he sued
defendant and respondent Chino Valley Independent Fire District (the District) for
employment discrimination (case No. E052123). The trial court then granted Williams’s
1 motions to tax costs in part and entered an order granting the District costs of $5,368.88.
Williams appeals from the order, contending that no costs should have been allowed.