Hales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRI TOOL, INC., No. 2:22-cv-01515-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, v. SCHEDULING ORDER THAD HALES, et al., Defendants. 16 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court has reviewed the parties’ joint1 status report (Doc. No. 87) and has determined that the court need not “consult[]

The status report was filed by plaintiff Tri Tool, Inc. and defendant Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (collectively, “the corporate parties”). (Doc. No. 87 at 3.) In the status report, the corporate parties state that the remaining parties to this action, defendants Thad Hales and Mike Bracikowski, have been unresponsive to by the corporate parties’ attempts to contact them “for an 22 extended period.” (Id. at 3 n.1.) According to the corporate parties, defendants Hales and Bracikowski did not participate in the preparation of the status report. (Id.) A review of the docket in this action reflects that defendant Hales last filed anything on…