Birtwell

(PC) Harrison v. Birtwell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20252:24-cv-01413California431 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL DAVID HARRISON, No. 2:24-cv-01413-DC-CSK (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

BIRTWELL, et al., THIS ACTION Defendants. (Doc. No. 14) 16 Plaintiff Michael David Harrison is a federal prisoner appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 17, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending this action be dismissed, without prejudice, due to Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action and failure to comply with a court order. (Doc. No. 14.) Specifically, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the court’s order dated August 5, 2024, in which Plaintiff’s complaint was 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.