(BK) In Re: James Paul Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20252:24-cv-03412California658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES PAUL JONES, No. 2:24-cv-03412-DC Appellant, v. ORDER DISMISSING THIS ACTION DUE

TO APPELLANT’S FAILURE TO COMPLY

NIKKI B. FARRIS, WITH COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

Appellee.

16 On March 6, 2025, the court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause “why this bankruptcy Appeal should not be dismissed due to his failure to comply with the court’s orders and failure to prosecute.” (Doc. No. 5.) Appellant’s deadline to respond to that order has now passed, and Appellant has not filed a response or a request for an extension of time in which to do so. In light of Appellant’s failure to timely respond to the order to show cause and his failure to comply with the court’s January 6, 2025 order directing Appellant to file “a Designation of Record, Statement of Issues on Appeal and a Notice regarding the ordering of transcripts with the bankruptcy court,” as required (Doc. No. 4), it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.