(BK) In Re: James Paul Jones
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES PAUL JONES, No. 2:24-cv-03412-DC Appellant, v. ORDER DISMISSING THIS ACTION DUE
TO APPELLANT’S FAILURE TO COMPLY
NIKKI B. FARRIS, WITH COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE
Appellee.
16 On March 6, 2025, the court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause “why this bankruptcy Appeal should not be dismissed due to his failure to comply with the court’s orders and failure to prosecute.” (Doc. No. 5.) Appellant’s deadline to respond to that order has now passed, and Appellant has not filed a response or a request for an extension of time in which to do so. In light of Appellant’s failure to timely respond to the order to show cause and his failure to comply with the court’s January 6, 2025 order directing Appellant to file “a Designation of Record, Statement of Issues on Appeal and a Notice regarding the ordering of transcripts with the bankruptcy court,” as required (Doc. No. 4), it…