Momand

(PS) Amin v. Momand

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20252:24-cv-03557California2,137 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NAJIBULLA AMIN, No. 2:24-cv-03557-TLN-SCR Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DAMAN MOMAND, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff proceeds pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10 & 12)1 which seeks to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. Opposition and reply briefs have been filed. ECF Nos. 13 & 14. On April 3, 2025, Plaintiff failed to appear at a hearing on Defendant’s motion. The Court recommends that the Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED without leave to amend. I. Background and Procedural History The Complaint was filed on December 18, 2024. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff alleges that jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship and that Defendants owe him $37,234. Id. at 5. It appears that Plaintiff alleges Defendants made a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.