David

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANCE DAVID, et al., No. 2:25-cv-00534-DC-SCR Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF LANCE DAVID AS

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR PLAINTIFFS

B.M., M.N., AND L.N.

Defendants. (Doc. No.) 16 On February 18, 2025, Plaintiff Lance David filed a motion for appointment as guardian ad litem for minor Plaintiffs B.N., M.N., and L.N. in this case. (Doc. No. 5.) The court denied that motion without prejudice on March 20, 2025, because the motion did not comply with the requirements of Local Rule 202(c). (Doc. No. 8.) On March 25, 2025, Plaintiff Lance David filed a renewed for appointment as guardian ad litem for minor Plaintiffs B.N., M.N., and L.N., and concurrently filed a declaration of Plaintiffs’ counsel, Attorney Michael A. Slater, as well as a declaration of Plaintiff Lance David. (Doc. No. 9.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the pending motion is taken under submission to be decided on the…