Newsom

(HC) Kelly v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20252:25-cv-00769California223 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES CARL KELLY, Case No. 2:25-cv-0769-DJC-JDP (P) Petitioner, v. ORDER GALVAN NEWSOM, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. The application attacks a conviction issued by the Alameda County Superior Court. While both this court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner’s application are more readily available in Alameda County. Id. at 499 n.15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.