(PS)(UD)Omnivest Corp v. Harmon
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OMNIVEST CORP, No. 2:25-cv-00995-DAD-SCR (UD) (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SUA SPONTE REMANDING CASE
TO THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY
JOHNNY ACEVEDO, et al., SUPERIOR COURT AND DENYING
MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
Defendants. PAUPERIS AS MOOT (Doc. No. 2) 17 This is an unlawful detainer action brough under California state law by plaintiff Omnivest Corp. On April 2, 2025, defendants, proceeding pro se, removed this case to this federal court from the Sacramento County Superior Court and defendant Acevedo filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. Nos. 1, 2.) A district court has “a duty to establish subject matter jurisdiction over the removed action sua sponte, whether the parties raised the issue or not.” United Investors Life Ins. Co. v. Waddell & Reed, Inc., 360 F.3d 960, 967 (9th Cir. 2004). The removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1441, is strictly construed against…