Robertson
(UD)(PS) The Vue on Seamist, LLC v. Robertson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THE VUE ON SEAMIST, LLC, No. 2:25-cv-00996-DAD-CSK (UD) (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SUA SPONTE REMANDING CASE
TO SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR
SCHIRELLE ROBERTSON, COURT AND DENYING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT
Defendant. (Doc. No. 2)
17 This is an unlawful detainer action brought under California state law by plaintiff The Vue on Seamist, LLC. On April 2, 2025, defendant, proceeding pro se, removed this case to this federal court from the Sacramento County Superior Court and filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. Nos. 1, 2.) A district court has “a duty to establish subject matter jurisdiction over the removed action sua sponte, whether the parties raised the issue or not.” United Investors Life Ins. Co. v. Waddell & Reed, Inc., 360 F.3d 960, 967 (9th Cir. 2004). The removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1441, is strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Geographic Expeditions, Inc. v.…