Baughman

Baughman v. Walt Disney World Co.

Good Law
159 Cal. Rptr. 3d 825·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 566·217 Cal. App. 4th 1438·2013 WL 3777037
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 18, 2013G046470California3,534 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moore, J.

In 2007, plaintiff Tina Baughman brought suit against Walt Disney World Co. (Disney) alleging negligence per se and violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ( 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.; ADA), California’s Disabled Persons Act (Civ. Code, § 54 et seq.; DPA), and the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq.), based on Disney’s refusal to allow her to use a Segway at Disneyland, a place she has never been. Baughman alleged the Segway is her preferred method of transportation, given that her muscular dystrophy substantially limits her ability to walk. The ADA cause of action was subsequently removed to the federal district court.

The trial court below granted Disney’s motion for summary judgment and entered judgment in Disney’s favor. We find Disney established it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law in that it demonstrated a Segway is an unstable two-wheeled device that could accelerate quickly, either forward or backward, and injure the rider and/or others if the rider is bumped. The undisputed expert evidence showed Segways cannot be used safely in Disneyland crowds due to its method of operation. In all of the papers submitted, there is no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.