Espinosa-Ramirez

Espinosa-Ramirez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 202524-467California514 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FERNANDO ESPINOSA-RAMIREZ, No. 24-467 Agency No. Petitioner, A078-329-843 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 3, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: BYBEE and FORREST, Circuit Judges, and RODRIGUEZ, District Judge.***

Petitioner Fernando Espinosa-Ramirez is a native and citizen of Mexico. He

seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order dismissing his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Xavier Rodriguez, United States District Judge for the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation. application for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention

Against Torture (“CAT”). We deny his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.