Sharma

Sharma v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 202524-2278California716 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAHIL SHARMA; DEVI No. 24-2278 PRIYANKA; K.J., Agency Nos.

A240-844-642

Petitioners, A240-844-643

A240-844-644

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 3, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ, KOH, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Sahil Sharma (“Sharma”), Devi Priyanka (“Priyanka”), and their minor

child, natives and citizens of India, petition for review of a decision by the Board

of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an appeal from an order by an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel previously granted Respondent’s motion to submit this case on the briefs [Dkt. 28]. Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying Sharma’s applications for asylum, withholding

of removal, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.