Martinez-Pena
Martinez-Pena v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 202524-728California624 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 7 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM MARTINEZ-PENA, No. 24-728 Agency No. Petitioner, A200-550-894 v. MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 3, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: GILMAN***, M. SMITH, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner William Martinez-Pena seeks review of a Board of Immigration
Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)
decision denying his application for cancellation of removal, asylum, and related
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Ronald Lee Gilman, United States Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit, sitting by designation.…