Singh

Singh v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 202523-2309California610 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GURPREET SINGH, No. 23-2309 Agency No. Petitioner, A209-387-465 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 5, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, BEA, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Gurpreet Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of a

decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an appeal from

an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we grant the petition.

1. The BIA erred when…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.