Singh
Singh v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 202523-2309California610 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 7 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GURPREET SINGH, No. 23-2309 Agency No. Petitioner, A209-387-465 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 5, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: WARDLAW, BEA, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Gurpreet Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of a
decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an appeal from
an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his applications for asylum,
withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we grant the petition.
1. The BIA erred when…