Bondi

La Rosa Paredes v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 202524-3278California703 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILMER LA ROSA No. 24-3278 PAREDES; MILUSKA DEL CARMEN Agency Nos.

REYES; A.L.R.A., A243-158-595

A243-158-596

Petitioners,

A243-585-597

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 3, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ, KOH, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Wilmer Marco La Rosa Paredes (“La Rosa”), his wife, Miluska Del Carmen

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel previously granted the parties’ joint motion to submit this case on the briefs, Dkt. 21. Anton Reyes, and their child,1 natives and citizens of Peru, petition for review of a

decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an appeal from

an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying asylum, withholding of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.