Salazar

United States v. Salazar

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 202524-993California701 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

APR 7 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-993

Plaintiff-Appellee, DC No. 3:23-cr-00741-TWR-

v.

JENNIFER SALAZAR, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Todd W. Robinson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 27, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: TASHIMA, NGUYEN, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Jennifer Salazar appeals the sentence imposed following her conviction by

jury on one count of conspiracy to import fentanyl and one count of importation of

fentanyl, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960, and 963. We have jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1. The district court did not commit plain error in declining to apply a

downward adjustment for minor role in the offense under U.S. Sentencing

Guidelines Manual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.