Pirali

The People v. Pirali

Bad Law
159 Cal. Rptr. 3d 335·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 560·217 Cal. App. 4th 1341·2013 WL 3753974
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 17, 2013H038349California4,258 words

Opinion

Opinion

Premo, J.

Defendant John Pirali pleaded no contest to a charge of felony possession of child pornography (Pen. Code, § 311.11). On appeal, defendant challenges probation conditions restricting his access to the Internet and forbidding him from possessing or purchasing sexually explicit materials or pornography as overbroad and unconstitutionally vague. For the reasons set forth below, we modify the condition restricting his access to the Internet to include a knowledge requirement, and further modify the condition restricting his purchase and possession of sexually explicit or pornographic materials with the requirement that he is forbidden from possessing and purchasing these items having been told by the probation officer that such items are sexually explicit or pornographic. As modified, we affirm the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

In October 2008, defendant was served with a search warrant pursuant to an auto insurance fraud investigation. Defendant’s computer was taken to a computer analyst, who discovered the existence of possible child pornography on one of the seized hard drives. The computer analyst requested that another search warrant be obtained to search…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.