John Doe v. Regents of The University of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20253:22-cv-01506California418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN DOE, Case No.: 22-CV-1506 JLS (VET)

Plaintiff,

ORDER SUA SPONTE STRIKING

v. PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITIONS TO

DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS IN

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

LIMINE NOS. 1 &

CALIFORNIA,

15 (ECF Nos. 92, 93) Defendant. 16 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff John Doe’s Oppositions to Defendant’s Motions in Limine Nos. 1 and 2. ECF Nos. 92, 93. Throughout the exhibits attached to the Oppositions, Plaintiff redacted, without authority, Plaintiff’s real name. See ECF No. 48 (“No party may file any document under seal, expect [sic] pursuant to a court order that authorizes filing of the document, or portion of the document, under seal.” (emphasis added)). The Court recently made clear that, while Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed Anonymously remains pending, the Parties are to follow proper sealing procedures for redacting portions of filed documents. ECF No. 85 at 1–2 (outlining the procedures the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.