May

May v. City of Milpitas

Good Law
159 Cal. Rptr. 3d 310·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 557·217 Cal. App. 4th 1307·2013 WL 3725156
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 16, 2013H038338California10,883 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elia, J.

This case concerns resolution No. 8132 (Resolution) adopted by respondent City Council of the City of Milpitas (City Council). The Resolution approved amendments to a site development permit, a tentative map, and a conditional use permit for the Citation Residential Project to allow the development of 732 condominium units. After the adoption of the Resolution, respondent City of Milpitas (City) filed a notice of exemption (NOE). Appellants Michael May and Carpenters Local Union No. 405 sought to challenge the approvals on the ground that an environmental impact report (EIR) was not prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.). Respondents demurred on the ground that the statute of limitations established by Government Code section 65457 had expired. The trial court sustained the demurrer without leave to amend. On appeal, appellants challenge that order.

We conclude that the trial court’s order sustaining the demurrer was proper since appellants’ allegations and judicially noticed documents show that the CEQA challenge is necessarily time-barred under Government Code section 65457. Accordingly, we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.