Cammack

Golden Eagle Insurance Corporation v. Cammack

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20253:24-cv-01670California297 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE Case No. 24-cv-01670-AMO CORPORATION, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 10 RICHARD CAMMACK, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 56 11 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s January 29, 2025 order staying proceedings pending resolution of the state court case. Plaintiffs contend that the Court failed to consider the California Court of Appeal’s decision in Gordon v. Continental Cas. Co., 107 Cal. App. 5th 90 (2024). A party seeking reconsideration must show one of the following grounds for relief applies: (1) “a material difference in fact or law exists from that which was presented to the Court before entry of the [challenged] order,” and the party seeking reconsideration could not, with “reasonable diligence,” have known of such fact or law at the time of the order; (2)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.