Wyatt

Wyatt v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20251:21-cv-00455California3,800 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EMMANUEL WYATT, et al., No. 1:21-cv-00455-DAD-JDP Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. (Doc. No. 65) COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al.,

Defendants. 16 This matter is before the court on the motion for partial summary judgment filed on behalf of plaintiffs on July 18, 2024. (Doc. No. 65.) The pending motion was taken under submission pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 72.) For the reasons explained below, plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment in their favor will be denied. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background1 Plaintiffs are Emmanuel and Makeda Wyatt (“plaintiff Emmanuel” and “plaintiff Makeda,” respectively), the parents of seven minors. (PUF ¶ 1.) Defendants are County of /////

The relevant facts that follow are undisputed unless otherwise noted and are derived from the undisputed facts as stated by plaintiffs and responded to by defendants (Doc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.