Jason Mico Hookano v. Delaware North Companies, Incorporated
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON MICO HOOKANO, individually, ) Case No. CV 24-7880 FMO (RAOx) and on behalf of others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER Re: PENDING MOTION v. ) )
DELAWARE NORTH COMPANIES, )
INCORPORATED, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 17 Having reviewed and considered all the briefing filed with respect to plaintiff Jason Mico Hookano’s (“plaintiff”) Motion to Remand Case to Superior Court, (Dkt. 14, “Motion”), the court concludes that oral argument is not necessary to resolve the Motion, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L. R. 7-15; Willis v. Pac. Mar. Ass’n, 244 F.3d 675, 684 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2001), and concludes as follows. BACKGROUND On August 1, 2024, plaintiff filed a putative a wage-and-hour class action in state court against Delaware North Companies, Incorporated and The Patina Group NewCo, LLC (collectively,…