Jason Mico Hookano v. Delaware North Companies, Incorporated

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20252:24-cv-07880California1,927 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON MICO HOOKANO, individually, ) Case No. CV 24-7880 FMO (RAOx) and on behalf of others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER Re: PENDING MOTION v. ) )

DELAWARE NORTH COMPANIES, )

INCORPORATED, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 17 Having reviewed and considered all the briefing filed with respect to plaintiff Jason Mico Hookano’s (“plaintiff”) Motion to Remand Case to Superior Court, (Dkt. 14, “Motion”), the court concludes that oral argument is not necessary to resolve the Motion, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L. R. 7-15; Willis v. Pac. Mar. Ass’n, 244 F.3d 675, 684 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2001), and concludes as follows. BACKGROUND On August 1, 2024, plaintiff filed a putative a wage-and-hour class action in state court against Delaware North Companies, Incorporated and The Patina Group NewCo, LLC (collectively,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.