Hirou
American Heritage Railways, Inc. v. Hirou
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMERICAN HERITAGE RAILWAYS, Case No.: 3:24-cv-01802-CAB-JLB INC., et al.,
ORDER:
Plaintiffs, 13 v. (1) DENYING MOTION TO 14 CORRECT DOCKET ENTRIES; and BRADLEY ARTHUR HIROU, et al., 15 Defendants. (2) DENYING DEMAND FOR
TRACKABLE PROOF OF SERVICE
17 [Doc. Nos. 29, 30]
I. MOTION TO CORRECT DOCKET ENTRIES
20 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a), Defendant seeks to have docket entries 28 and 29, 21 which were both initially labeled within the docket as “Certificate of Service,” instead 22 labeled as “Defendant’s Demand for Trackable Proof of Service from Plaintiffs,” [Doc. 23 No. 29], and “Affidavit in Support of Defendant’s Demand for Trackable Proof of Service 24 from Plaintiff,” [Doc. No. 28]. 25 Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a) states that “a clerical mistake or a mistake arising . . . [in] part 26 of the record” can only be corrected with the appellate court’s leave “after an appeal has 27 been docketed in the appellate court and while it is pending.” Defendant has filed a notice 28 of appeal with the…