(PC)Valencia
(PC)Valencia v. Medina
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER G. VALENCIA, No. 1:22-cv-00569 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR DATE TO BE CORRECTED
v. (ECF No. 15) MEDINA, et al.,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
Defendants. FOR LEAVE TO CORRECT
TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR IN DATE
16 (ECF No. 16)
18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 19 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 20 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff has paid the filing fee. 21 Before this Court are Plaintiff’s motion for date to be corrected due to typing error and his 22 motion for leave to correct typographical error in date. ECF Nos 15, 16 (respectively). For the 23 reasons stated below, both motions will be denied.
I. PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS
25 A. Plaintiff’s Motion for Date to Be Corrected Due to Typing Error 26 In Plaintiff’s motion for date to be corrected due to typing error (ECF No. 15),…