Johnson v. City of Syracuse Department of Neighborhood & Business Development

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20253:24-cv-01838California542 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT W. JOHNSON, Case No. 24-cv-1838-BAS-DTF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

CITY OF SYRACUSE DEPARTMENT

OF NEIGHBORHOOD & BUSINESS

DEVELOPMENT, ATEM FARMS,

16 Defendants.

On October 11, 2024, Plaintiff Robert W. Johnson, proceeding pro se, commenced this action. (ECF No. 1.) The same day, Plaintiff also filed an application seeking leave to proceed without prepaying fees or costs, also known as proceeding in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2.) A month later, the Court denied Johnson’s application to proceed IFP because he did not provide information as to how he obtains the necessities of life, instead marking all values for his income as $0.00. (ECF No. 3.) The Court ordered Johnson to either pay the filing fee or file a new request to proceed IFP. (Id. at 3.) However, the Order denying Johnson IFP status was returned as undeliverable to this Court. (ECF No. 4.) Last month,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.