(SS) Armes v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20251:23-cv-00905California4,038 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHERRY LYNN ARMES, No. 1:23-cv-00905-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401, et seq. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be denied and the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment will be granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff applied for DIB on March 18, 2021. ECF No. 11-1, Administrative Record (“AR”) 205-06. Plaintiff alleged the disability onset date was May 25, 2020, at which point she was 60 years old. AR 18, 306. The applications were disapproved initially (AR 113), and on reconsideration (AR 119). //// On June 23, 2022, administrative law judge (“ALJ”) Joseph Doyle…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.