Marshall

Marshall v. Alameda Contra Costa Transit District

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20254:24-cv-00996California2,910 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANNY MARSHALL, Case No. 24-cv-00996-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

ALAMEDA CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT FURTHER AMEND COMPLAINT DISTRICT, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 52, 61 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Defendant Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 192’s (“ATU Local 192”) motion for partial reconsideration, ECF No. 52, and Plaintiff Danny Marshall’s motion for leave to further amend the complaint, ECF No. 61. The Court will grant both motions in part. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Danny Marshall is an employee of Defendant Alameda Contra Costa Transit District (“AC Transit”), a public entity that operates a bus fleet in Alameda and Contra Costa. ECF No. 1, Ex. F ¶ 5. He alleges that although he was performing his job as AC Transit’s Mentor Coordinator satisfactorily, he was removed from the position and replaced by a less qualified, less …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.