Doe 1400 v. Stanford Health Care

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20255:24-cv-09359California4,133 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 DOE #1400, Case No. 5:24-cv-09359-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

CORRECTED SECOND AMENDED

STANFORD HEALTH CARE, COMPLAINT; GRANTING MOTION

TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE

Defendant. COURT; GRANTING IN PART

MOTION TO SEAL RECORD; AND

DENYING MOTION TO SHORTEN

TIME AND FOR LEGAL ADVICE

12 [Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 23, 32, 33] 13 Pro se Plaintiff Doe #1400, who is proceeding in this action under a pseudonym, has filed four motions: (1) a motion seeking leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, Dkt. No. 23; (2) a motion to remand the above-captioned action to state court, Dkt. No. 20; (3) a motion to seal the entire federal record in this case, Dkt. No. 20; and (4) a motion to shorten time and to request guidance as to the availability of sanctions against Defendant Stanford Health Care, Dkt. Nos. 32, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.